Reframing the debate on quality v/s quantity in research assessment
Article Type
Research Article
Publication Title
DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology
Abstract
The debate on quality versus quantity is still persistent for methodological considerations. These two approaches are highly contrasting in their epistemology and contrary to each other. A single composite indicator that reasonably senses both quality and quantity would be significant toward performance. This paper evaluates the potency of the combined metric for quality assessment of publications (QP) in India’s National Institutional Research Framework (NIRF) exercise in 2020. It also suggests a potential improvement in quality measurement to obtain the rankings more rationally with finer tunings.
First Page
70
Last Page
71
DOI
10.14429/djlit.41.1.16682
Publication Date
1-1-2021
Recommended Citation
Pal, Jiban K., "Reframing the debate on quality v/s quantity in research assessment" (2021). Journal Articles. 2218.
https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/journal-articles/2218
Comments
Open Access, Gold, Green