Reply on the comments on the paper “evidence of fluvial to marine transition in the siwalik rocks of the itanagar area, arunachal pradesh, india: Implication for the regional paleogeography” by mullick & sinha 2024, himalayan geology, 45(1), 138-154
Article Type
Research Article
Publication Title
Himalayan Geology
Abstract
We welcome the comments by Chakraborty et al. on our paper and acknowledge them for their great time and effort for reading our article so thoroughly and to provide their precious suggestions. Here, we reply to the doubts and queries raised by them for clarification, most of which possibly arise due to misinterpretation of our data. We hereby respond to the queries about the technical issues, facies, drainage system and sedimentological interpretation and in reply would definitely like to answer some of their logical queries in light of sedimentological overview and our field observations, keeping in mind not to substantiate the credibility of Indian sedimentologists in front of international researchers. We would like to address the comments in a pointwise manner to make the writing more straight-forward and to-the-point.
First Page
265
Last Page
268
Publication Date
1-1-2024
Recommended Citation
Mullick, Subhra and Sinha, Subhajit, "Reply on the comments on the paper “evidence of fluvial to marine transition in the siwalik rocks of the itanagar area, arunachal pradesh, india: Implication for the regional paleogeography” by mullick & sinha 2024, himalayan geology, 45(1), 138-154" (2024). Journal Articles. 5039.
https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/journal-articles/5039